Alan Paton Style Analysis Essay

Writers regularly have an effect on the peruser through innovative narrating and enlivening fascinating and convincing characters in their accounts. Alan Paton prevails with regards to doing this, yet further increases present expectations by completely drenching his perusers by making them find out about the characters, however really ingrains a feeling of thinking about their prosperity. All through the novel Paton makes it understood exactly how much affliction and enduring his character, Stephen Kumalo, more likely than not persevered. He uses reverberating words, for example, â€Å"doubt† and â€Å"suffering† in the section picked. The tone all through the entry seems to have solemn and despairing quality to it. Kumalo is indicated suffering consistent catastrophe surrounding him yet he keeps on enduring. Paton’s whimsical methods of discourse is indicated frequently in this section. Paton’s exchange never distinguishes who is addressing urge the peruser to focus, additionally he doesn't utilize quotes like most creators and just detours it totally. Paton utilizes restricted omniscient perspective to recount to the story. It accepts us into the tales as well as blends feeling inside the peruser. He permits us to be placed in Stephen’s shoes while still left thinking about what is truly going on. Character improvement is exceptionally clear all through the section. Kumalo began in the story as a minister whose confidence was solid in God, however now and again had questions, here and there he would question his child for carrying out outrages, yet at long last he discovered pardoning for his family. Stephan is the exemplification of beating misfortune regardless of what risks he went over.

Essay --

Intense on lawbreakers, delicate on wrongdoing: force, drugs and the disappointment Over the ongoing past one of the serious issues has been that of contentions between the crooks and the general public all in all. There has been banter in regards to the realities whether we have dealt with the issues all the more apropos or not. Since there are sure ways of thinking that are of the supposition that we ought not go delicate on the wrongdoing side regardless or structure. It is this universe of the sorted out wrongdoing that is answerable for all the force misuse and the medications and they have caused, actuated and now and again paid off the individuals to carry the social framework to a stop. It is all their doing which can end up being unreasonably exorbitant for the individuals and the way of life just as for the economy all in all over the long haul. According to the contention point of view, the differential structure of social force essentially necessitates that prevailing gat herings to practice power over subordinate gatherings however is that actually the case? Truly we do require some type of predominance and the other over the timeframe however is that actually all that there is to life? In all actuality on the off chance that we take a gander at things this is the manner in which we have started to see things on the grounds that a greater and a superior society needs individuals to be increasingly open and they should be progressively able. They are the ones who need to take a gander at the things and it is dependent upon them to decipher the implications of the things in the strict sense. On the off chance that we begin to accept that the individuals will rule others and there are some who are accommodating and harmless and there would others say others are who are acceptable at administration and who are acceptable at controlling things is that the adequate motivation to permit them to do the things their way? As I would like to think it ought to never be that way essentially in light of the fact that the individuals who have the force ... ... move constantly. It is about the idea of dependence and the subordinate wrongdoing related with it, which causes such a significant number of individuals to get trapped in everything. Despite the fact that there has been a great deal of discussion about the treatment and recovery and the explanation behind that will be that it is altogether more affordable and progressively viable. Open wellbeing is something that is totally reliant on how well we can control the previously mentioned social wrongs on the grounds that before them it turns into an auxiliary thing. Imprisonment isn't generally the main arrangement that is accessible to the specialists since that may discourage the universe of sorted out wrongdoing however it doesn't strike at the very roots that it is established on. That is the entire target that we ought to abstain from going delicate on the universe of wrongdoing no matter what in the event that we need to get any opportunity of saving the holiness of things to c ome ages.

Hacks and meta-hacks

Hacks and meta-hacks A few nights ago, I was walking down the Infinite Corridor with two of my halls freshmen, when one of them noticed something odd in the Guide to Facilities for Individuals with Disabilities campus map psoted on the wall. You cant really see anything in that picture. But what my friend had noticed was that several of the buildings had tiny stickers on them, picturing hacks that had happened on those buildings in the last few years. I was really entertained by this clever and subtle hack, so I took pictures. Ill also summarize the pictured hacks for you. Its been a while since the Hack Gallery was updated, and only a couple of these hacks have been put in it. Most of the hacks, youll notice, are cross-group, and the team working on the hack often included members of such groups as Jack Florey, James Tetazoo, the Order of Random Knights, the Western Hacking Organization, and/or no group at all. Picture 1: Location: Killian Court Hack: Model rockets distribute fliers over freshman photo Date: Orientation 2003, 2004 Group: Western Hacking Organization (WHO) Location: Great Dome Hack: Wright Flyer Date: December 17, 2003 (the 100th anniversary of airplane flight) Group: None/cross-group Comments: If any of you guys actually read my blogyou were my heroes when I was a frosh! Location: Building 7 Hack: Banner bearing the words The Only put over Massachusetts in Massachusetts Institute of Technology, replacing banner put up by Caltech that said That Other. Date: Campus Preview Weekend 2005 Group: None/cross-group Comments: This was part of the CPW 2005 Caltech vs. MIT hacking war. I remember eating dinner in the 4th West diner at two in the morning with some of the Caltech hackers. Picture 2: Location: MacGregor House Hack: Go Sox banner Date: Either the last playoffs or last World Series, I forget Group: Presumably people from MacGregor, but maybe WHO Location: Strung over Briggs Field between MacGregor and Simmons Hack: I Hate The Flag Policy protest banner Date: February 17, 2004 Group: None/cross-group Comments: Some explanation of the Flag Policy controversy Picture 3: Location: East Campus courtyard Hack: Coffeemate explosion (not really a hack but whatever) Date: Every year during Orientation, occasionally other times Group: Various residents of East Campus Location: Radome of Green Building Hack: Radome turned into weird smiley thing from Hitchhikers Guide series Date: May(?) 2005 (opening day of Hitchhikers Guide movie Group: James Tetazoo, I think Picture 4: Location: Stata Center (side facing Vassar Street) Hack: Giant property of MIT bar code with bars shaped to resemble Stata Center Date: May 2004 (the day Stata was dedicated) Group: None/cross-group Comments: If you look you can find IHTFP in the bars. And the serial number on the banner is the cost of building Stata in scientific notation. Picture 5: Location: Inside of Rockwell Cage Hack: Harvard banner sporting the words Huge Ego on Harvard logo in place of whatever Harvards motto is Date: Campus Preview Weekend 2003 Group: Either WHO or cross-group, Im not sure So yeah, thats nine hacks. The tenth, I suppose, is the meta-hack itself the map. Location: Infinite Corridor Hack: Stickers representing hacks put on campus map Date: September 2005 Group: I have no idea

Courts Have Developed And Limited Law For Psychiatric Victims - Free Essay Example

Sample details Pages: 8 Words: 2270 Downloads: 4 Date added: 2017/06/26 Category Law Essay Type Critical essay Level High school Did you like this example? Critically analyse the way the courts have developed and limited the law in relation to claims for psychiatric harm by secondary victims Date authored: 24 th May, 2014. As Lord Steyn noted in his judgment in White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others, 1 the law on the recovery of compensation for psychiatric harm is: a patchwork quilt of distinctions which are difficult to justify What Lord Steyn meant by this is that; the law regarding claims for psychiatric harm has been developed in a piecemeal way through common law and can often be seen to conflict with itself in many areas.2 It is due to this that claims by secondary victims for psychiatric harm are often hard to assess as to their likely success and merit in a court of law. 3 There is also an argument that recent policy decisions by judges have overly restricted a secondary victims access to justice. First of all it is important to understand what is meant by the terms primary and secondary victims in relation to psychiatric harm and what the difference between these potential claimants is. Primary victims were first identified in Dulieu v White 4. Th is case established that a primary victim can recover damages for psychiatric injury stemming from actual physical injury or from a reasonable fear or apprehension of danger to their physical safety. This was expanded in Page v Smith5 Don’t waste time! Our writers will create an original "Courts Have Developed And Limited Law For Psychiatric Victims" essay for you Create order where it was held that if physical harm is foreseeable, the claimant can recover in respect of both physical and psychiatric harm, even where the latter is not in itself foreseeable. This reasoning was applied in Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd6 where the House of Lords held that Corr was a primary victim and his psychiatric illness was the same ‘type of harm as his foreseeable physical injuries. His suicide was not an uncommon manifestation of depression. It could be argued that Lord Lloyds definition of a primary victim as a party who is within the zone of physical danger7 limits the primary victim category. However, Lord Hope in Grieves v FT Everard Sons8 cautioned against expanding this category for policy reasons and to prevent opening the potential floodgate for psychiatric harm claims. These same cautious policy considerations can also be seen when examining the secondary victim category and the criteria needed to make a claim as a secondary victim for psychiatric harm. There is also confusion among judges and claimants about which category a claimant may fall in to. 9 A secondary victim can be described as someone who is not personally at risk of physical injury but who suffers psychiatric injury as a result of witnessing someone else being harmed or endangered. One of the main policy considerations for this category of claimants is that the psychiatric injury suffered must be reasonably foreseeable in a person of ‘ordinary fortitude in the same circumstances. In Bourhill v Young10 the House of Lords rejected a claim on the grounds that the claimant was not herself in physical danger and that she was particularly susceptible to shock. It could be argued that this area of law should follow the thin skull rule established in Smith v Leech Brain Co11 and that just because a person is particularly susceptible to harm, this should not remove the defendants liability.12 Indeed, the modern approach set out in McLoughlin v OBrian 13 does not place so much emphasis on a persons fortitude but more on the principles of reasonable foreseeability or by independent policy-based factors. These factors include the closeness of the relationship between the claimant and accident v ictim, the proximity of the claimant to the accident itself and whether the shock was induced by what the claimant saw or experienced as opposed to what they were told after the event. It could be argued that this is a much fairer system as it allows for a more level playing field for claimants and that the (possibly outdated) notion of a persons fortitude is partially dispensed with. However, after this case the mood shifted towards a more restrictive approach in Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police. 14 This was a test case involving ten representatives of the friends and families of the victims of the Hillsborough disaster and it is from this case that many of the issues surrounding secondary victims arises. None of the claimants were able to recover as primary victims as they had not been directly involved in the disaster but the court had to consider whether they could recover as secondary victims. The Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police admitted negligence in respect of those who had been killed or injured at Hillsborough but argued he did not owe a duty of care to those who had suffered psychiatric damage as a result of seeing or hearing the news of what had happened. The claims were rejected by the Court of Appeal and the House of Lords and Lord Oliver set out guidelines (known as Alcock control mechanisms) as to when a claim should be allowed. These related to the class of persons whose claim should be recognised, the proximity of the claimant to the accident a nd the means by which the shock is cause. This has severely limited the scope for who may be classed as a secondary victim and has arguably led to confusion and therefore a lack of parity in judgements.15 Firstly it must be shown that there is a ‘close tie of love and affection between the claimant and the accident victim. This is presumed in spouses; and parents and children (this can be rebutted) but not presumed in siblings and other relatives (they must prove this tie exists). It could be considered that this is unfair and overly limiting. Asking a sibling to prove they had a close relationship to a victim could be argued to be emotionally damaging, especially considering the claimant may already be suffering from a psychiatric illness due to the death of a loved one. Conversely, presuming this relationship between parents and children may not be the correct approach. A claimant who did not have a particularly close tie to a parent may attempt to make a spurious claim based on this policy. Secondly a claimant must prove their proximity to an accident or happen upon its immediate aftermath to have a successful claim. However, cases have shown that this policy rule may be overly subjective and is not applied evenly or fairly across all cases. For example in Mcloughlin 16 it was agreed that witnessing the victims injuries two hours after the event was enough to establish proximity. However, in Alcock17 it was deemed that witnessing the aftermath nine hours after the event was not sufficient to establish proximity and therefore establish a claim. The later case of Galli-Atkinson v Seghal18 allowed a mothers claim for psychiatric harm saying the aftermath could be viewed as being made up of different parts – the visit to the scene and the hospital morgue. These three differing judgements show that Lord Steyns patchwork comment to be accurate when dealing with secondary victims. Thirdly there is the requirement that there must be immediate perception and shock. That is to say that the harm must be sustained as a result of the sudden and direct appreciation of a shocking or horrifying event rather than as the result of a continuous process of dealing with or responding to such events. Potentially conflicting judgments can also be seen here which may overly limit the scope for potential claimants. In Sion v Hampstead Health Authority19 it was ruled that a father did not satisfy the immediate perception requirement as he watched his son die over a fourteen day period. However in Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust20 a mother was allowed to recover for damages after the death of her baby son. The Court held that the aftermath wasnt confined to one moment in time and the thirty six hour period could be classed as a single horrifying event. Limiting claims in this way could be considered very unfair. Not everyone is affected by events in the same way and is it fair to say that because someone took a long time to die means that a claimant has suffered less psychiatric harm because of this? 21 It could be argued that in fact, they may have suffered more psychiatric harm due to the prolonged nature of the events. Other potential secondary victims have also seen their scope for claiming limited in recent cases; for example, psychiatric harm suffered by emergency service workers and rescuers. In the past the judi ciary have tended to allow claims for rescuers.22 However in White 23 the House of Lords held that neither a rescuer nor an employee was placed in any special position in relation to recovery for psychiatric harm by virtue of being a rescuer or employee. This therefore limited claims for recovery for psychiatric harm. It could be argued that emergency services personnel should be limited in their scope for claiming psychiatric damage as they would have known and accepted the risk by entering in to this line of work. However, establishing a blanket approach may limit their access to justice for extremely horrific events resulting in psychiatric harm. Claims for witnessing self harm have also been limited. Where a claimant suffers psychiatric harm after witnessing the defendant negligently injure himself public policy grounds have been used to deny recovery for damages. 24 There have been calls for legislative intervention. The Law Commission Report on Liability for Recovery f or Psychiatric Illnesses 1998 25 concentrated on the position of secondary victims recognising the flood gates arguments. It suggested the ‘control mechanisms in Alcock should be modified by restricting the criteria of proximity and concentrating on the requirement of a close tie of love and affection. The Law Commission recommended a fixed list of relationships where a close tie would be conclusively proved. It also recommended the abolition of the requirement of a sudden shock and that it should include negligently inflicted psychiatric injury that had developed over a number of years. The Commission also wanted liability for situations where the defendants actions in imperilling themselves caused the claimants psychiatric illness. They incorporated a draft bill (Draft Negligence (Psychiatric Illness) Bill) and attached it to the Report but Parliament has yet pass this in to legislation. In conclusion then, while it is fair to say that not everyone should be able to claim for witnessing an accident, as it would lead to an overwhelming number of cases, there is an argument that the courts may have overly limited the scope under which a secondary victim can claim. The proximity considerations, closeness of relationship and immediate perception requirements have been shown to be potentially over limiting and unfair. Judgements could also be said to be inconsistent and this makes it difficult for the public to have confidence in the court system. It is likely that legislation is needed to codify existing case law to allow for a fairer system with greater parity and consistency. However, the fact that sixteen years have passed since the initial draft stage of legislation aimed at solving the problems, shows that this is not a priority for recent governments. Bibliography Cases Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 Chadwick v British Railways Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] UKHL 13 Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 Galli Atkinson v Seghal [2003] EWCA Civ 697 Greatorex v Greatorex [2000] 1 WLR 1970 Grieves v FT Everard Sons Ltd [2007] UKHL 39 McLoughlin v OBrian [1983] 1 AC 410 Page v Smith [1995] UKHL 7 Sion v Hampstead Health Authority [1994] EWCA Civ 26 Smith v Leech Brain Co [1962] 2 QB 405 Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 1792 White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others [1998] UKHL 45; [1999] 2 AC 455 Journals and Reports Hogarth A, Unpicking the Patchwork Quilt Secondary Victims and Psychiatric Injury Where are we now? [2010] 12KBW Kotak D, Communication with relatives and carers — another source of litigation [2008] JICS 212, 213 Law Commission, Liability for Psychiatric Illness (Law Com No 249, 1998) Leverick F, Counting the ways of becoming a primary victim: Anderson v Christian Salvesen. [2008] ELR 258, 263 Texts M Elliot, Secondary victims of negligence in (eds), Litigating Psychiatric Injury Claims: Personal Injury and Medical Negligence (1st, Bloomsbury Professional, London 2012). Websites Patten K, Patchwork quilt law (newlawjournal.co.uk 2013) https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/patchwork-quilt-law accessed 23/05/2014 1 White and Others v. Chief Constable of South Yorkshire and Others [1998] UKHL 45; [1999] 2 AC 455 2 Keith Patten, Patchwork quilt law (newlawjournal.co.uk 2013) https://www.newlawjournal.co.uk/nlj/content/patchwork-quilt-law accessed 23/05/2014 3 Andrew Hogarth, Unpicking the Patchwork Quilt Secondary Victims and Psychiatric Injury Where are we now? [2010] 12KBW 4 Dulieu v White [1901] 2 KB 669 5 Page v Smith [1995] UKHL 7 6 Corr v IBC Vehicles Ltd [2008] UKHL 13 7 Supra Note 3 Page v Smith [1995] UKHL 7 8 Grieves v FT Everard Sons Ltd [2007] UKHL 39 9 F Leverick, Counting the ways of becoming a primary victim: Anderson v Christian Salvesen. [2008] ELR 258, 263 10 Bourhill v Young [1943] AC 92 11 Smith v Leech Brain Co [1962] 2 QB 405 12 M Elliot, Secondary victims of negligence in (eds), Litigating Psychiatric Injury Claims: Personal Injury and Medical Negligence (1st, Bloomsbury Professional, London 2012). 13 McLoughlin v OBrian [1983] 1 AC 410 14 Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 15 Supra Note 3, p7 16 Supra Note 13 17 Alcock v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [1992] 1 AC 310 18 Galli Atkinson v Seghal [2003] EWCA Civ 697 19 Sion v Hampstead Health Authority [1994] EWCA Civ 26 20 Walters v North Glamorgan NHS Trust [2002] EWCA Civ 1792 21 D Kotak, Communication with relatives and carers — another source of litigation [2008] JICS 212, 213 22 Chadwick v British Railways Board [1967] 1 WLR 912 23 Supra Note 1 24 Greatorex v Greatorex [2000] 1 WLR 1970 25 Law Commission, Liability for Psychiatric Illness (Law Com No 249, 1998)

Global Warming And Its Effects On The World - 1074 Words

It would be a rare week indeed without hearing about global warming on the television or radio, or reading about it in the newspaper or an online blog. There have been many opinions from an abundance of points of view on the subject. Scientists, politicians, and environmentalists have all weighed in on the debate, and each of them is passionate about their beliefs. Some issues brought about due to global warming are polar ice caps melting, glaciers receding more and more each year, and rising ocean levels. These problems can lead to dwindling food supplies, fewer drinking water sources, and coastal flooding, to name a few (Miller 58). Essentially, the primary issue with global warming is whether humans are causing the planet’s climate to warm to damaging levels. Contrary to what the mainstream and social media would lead people to believe, global warming is most likely a natural cycle that planet Earth witnesses. Considering that politicizing global warming has become a national distraction, much of the discussion has become vague as to what is even at the core of the debate. To comprehend the debate about global warming, one needs to understand the definition of global warming. Global warming is the average temperature increase of the Earth’s oceans and atmosphere over the last century. The U.S. National Academy of Sciences states the Earth’s temperature has gone up one degree Fahrenheit over the last one hundred years (Miller 56). Much of the deliberation aboutShow MoreRelatedThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1235 Words   |  5 PagesThey may not be feeling the effects of global warming at the moment, but in time it will become a more widespread issue. The effects of global warming are hard to refute, and there is endless evidence of this growing problem in our world today. The continuation of global warming is a serious threat to everyone and everything on Ear th. Global warming has been a problem for over a hundred years, and it continues to grow every day. The first evidence of global warming was discovered in 1859 by JohnRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1575 Words   |  7 PagesGlobal warming has become a major issue in the world today. Not only are humans being affected, but many species and organisms are as well. Naturally, the Earth experiences heating and cooling cycles, and has over time. The ice age is a great example of a cooling cycle that was rather extreme. Since the industrial revolution, the amount of greenhouse gases has increased and built up in the atmosphere over time (Weart, 2015). The climate changes are being caused by the heat that is trapped in theRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World868 Words   |  4 PagesDisputed Global Warming Affects Global Warming is in the minds of critical thinkers and scientist as well as the Industrial World. In this paper, we will look at man-made causes of Global Warming, and natural causes in Global Warming Affects. The man- made cause would be (GHC) which abbreviates to greenhouse gases and the chemical (SO2) represents sulfur dioxide from cars and Industry. The natural cause in the climate would direct more to a cooler climate. The Global Warming remains,augmented thatRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1025 Words   |  5 PagesJacob Keirns Persuasive Paper Miss Beverly March 22, 2016 Global Warming â€Å"Some men aren t looking for anything logical, like money. They can t be bought, bullied, reasoned or negotiated with. Some men just want to watch the world burn.† -Christopher Nolan The late nineteenth century was a time of immense discovery, particularly in the world of science. First theorized in the 1890s, the idea of global warming has been around for just over 100 years, despite it’s relatively recent gain in tractionRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1267 Words   |  6 Pages Over the course of the years global warming has become a threatening issue that scientists and the government have been cognizant about. Global warming is the term used to describe a gradual increase in the average temperature of the Earth s atmosphere and its oceans, a change that is believed to be permanently changing the Earth’s climate. The earth periodically warms up and cools down. The Earth is currently going through a warming trend that coincides with the industrial revolution. ThisRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1185 Words   |  5 PagesThe Effects of Greenhouse Gasses Global Warming has been devastating the earth and economy for the last twenty-five years. Greenhouse gasses developed from the production of chemicals such as R-22, oil, and factories have destroyed ozone and ecosystems for the last hundred years. Carbon dioxide is produced naturally and absorbed by plants and animals, but, too much, and it is deadly. With the increase in automobiles and production, the world government has begun to address the issue of greenhouseRead MoreEffects Of Global Warming On The World Essay1816 Words   |  8 PagesDiseases, war, etc... Those are major concerns of this world, and climate change is always a hot issue given to debate. It s not just a matter of a single country, but it’s a problem of the whole human race. Humanity is facing the risk of extinction. The impact of environmental pollution leads to climate change and natural disasters such as earthquakes, tsunamis, and volcanoes. Those disasters are caused by the impact of humans to nature, such as deforestation, ecological imbalance, and use of chemicalsRead MoreGlobal Warming And Its Effect On The World1036 Words   |  5 Pagesdefinition of Global warming is; a gradual increase in the overall temperature of the earth s atmosphere generally attributed to the greenhouse effect caused by increased levels of carbon dioxide, chlorofluorocarbons, and other pollutants. Global warming is a very big issue that is slowly affecting the whole world. Climate change has been studied since the early 1970’s, and scientist of many different fields are agreeing that global warming’s effects are increasing at a rapid pace. Global Warming was notRead MoreGlobal Warming And Its Effects On The World Essay919 Words   |  4 PagesThe world has many years existing in this galaxy and every day we see that is changing more and more but not in a very good way that it can end in the extinction of the planet earth. â€Å"Earth Hasn’t Heated Up This Fast Since the Dinosau rs’ End† (Lavelle). Carbon is growing so fast in the atmosphere faster than in the past 66 million years since the dinosaurs went extinct (Lavelle). All the presidents hold a position of power that could change this big problem that the planet is having, behind thisRead MoreThe Effects Of Global Warming On The World1823 Words   |  8 PagesGlobal warming is called by some as a threat to all people on all nations while others disregard it as another publicity stunt by the media. Research tends to indicate that humans have caused most of the past century s warming by releasing heat-trapping gases as we power our modern lives. The result is global warming with the weather patterns shifting and glaciers melting, the world we know today is slowly dissipating as these changes bring about dramatic consequences for all on the planet including

Subjects to Citizens Locke, the Enlightenment Free Essays

The idea of people as citizens rather than as subjects originates in 16th century Europe, during the Early Modern Period. During this period, European social order was in a state of flux as the rule of kings was confronted with a persistent and determined challenges defined by social forces that were pushing for more secular and democratic governments. There were both individuals and events that today may be seen as powerful drivers of those forces, and among them are John Locke, the Enlightenment, and the French Revolution. We will write a custom essay sample on Subjects to Citizens: Locke, the Enlightenment or any similar topic only for you Order Now As such a force, the Enlightenment, which began during the mid-17th century and remained a major political and philosophical phenomenon until approximately 1800, had tremendous impact in the rise and triumph of democracy over monarchy. The Enlightenment was catalyzed by the persistent discourse of a number of philosophers and historians, one of the foremost of which was John Locke. The magnitude of change introduced by the Enlightenment is rendered more clearly when viewing that period in context of the preceding era—the Medieval Period, during which the rule of kings prevailed, sustained by an embedded religious institutions that qualified the lineages of kings for ruler ship through divine ordainment. The Church enjoyed considerable reciprocity from the crowns by doing so, because rulers recognized the equity that religion held in the minds of their â€Å"subjects†, and found value in making mutually beneficial agreements with the church to preserve this closed loop cycle of maintaining and preserving a rigid social order. The losers of course were the â€Å"subjects† of those kingdoms, who ultimately had little say in who ruled them, and who were indoctrinated into a life of mute slavery and poverty, deprived of both education as well as the right to imagine upward social mobility, much less the access to opportunities to actually pursue such improved quality of life. It was the endpoint of these social dynamics, and the progressive deterioration of social responsibility throughout the dual leadership trees of church and crown, that catalyzed the French Revolution during the last decade of the 18th century. The French Revolution, in a nutshell, was the revolt of the long repressed peasantry against what they rightfully recognized as a corrupt governmental power cartel defined by the closed loop relationships between the crown and the Church. The French Revolution really punctuates the spirit of the Enlightenment, because the Enlightenment was all about waking people up to the notion that they had a right to select their leaders and that anybody was capable of exercising reason and logic in doing so, and most importantly that exercising those capacities was a much better answer to society’s problems than continuing to rely on superstitious belief in the right of a lineage of kings to continue ruling despite worsening social conditions. It was not until the French Revolution however that the Enlightenment really manifested full force. John Locke died nearly a century before the French Revolution, but he played a key role in developing the philosophies that activated and drove the Enlightenment, particularly through his composition of the Two Treatises. In these documents, he makes an effort to refute the notion that people do not have the capacity or knowledge or political understanding to select their own rulers. Locke’s philosophical arguments here really took those of opposing contemporaries like Sir Robert Filmer, whose viewpoints closely reflect the social order maintained by pre-Enlightenment establishment. Filmer’s Patriarcha: The Natural Power of Kings Defended Against the Unnatural Liberty of the People, a composition that presented arguments supporting the pre-existing social order of monarchic rule. The prevailing establishment justified monarchic rule through a number of arguments, both sociological and religious. Among these, they did so by arguing that a nation is like a family, with the population as the children as the king as the parent. Another argument was that to share the power of leadership in a democratic manner would be to invite and embrace the breakdown of social ethics, presumably because the natural disposition of a populace is to chafe under rules and laws and to desire more freedom, and that the endpoint of this would be excessive liberties, the deterioration of morality and ultimately the rise of an era where selfish and unjust rulers would take power. Rulers believed that the population simply could not, nor would they ever in a sustainable manner be capable of, responsibly selecting its own leaders. Locke challenged these ideas by introducing the concept of the Commonwealth, which would be defined by a social contract whereby the members of the Commonwealth participate in surrendering a certain level of liberty in order to ensure the stability of society and the preservation of the community. This surrender would only be the minimum required to preserve the peace, safety and security of the commonwealth, and part of this would involve the implementation of a democratic or republican system by which citizens would have at least a representative body in the government to ensure their needs were addressed. Notably, this was a key factor that activated in the French peasantry a desire to overthrow the First and Second estates, which they felt were taxing them without caring for their needs or interests. How to cite Subjects to Citizens: Locke, the Enlightenment, Essay examples

Reflection on Hamlet Essay Example

Reflection on Hamlet Essay In regards to the Shakespearean play Hamlet, over the years as interpretations of a variety of elements have changed the structures, features and the timeless issues have remained similar in content. These timeless issues are untouched by context as the human condition and the quest for satisfaction has remained unfaltering. In relation to context there are two major differing contexts in which the play can be viewed. These are the Elizabethan viewpoint and that of todays society. To the Elizabethan audience the play of Hamlet was a text of moral instruction whilst the context of todays society is that Hamlet is the study of the individual. This essay will outline what has been learnt throughout the course of Hamlet with references to the two main differing contexts. The Elizabethan context conveys a theme of Christian Redemptive message where Gods plan always prevails no matter what obstacles were presented. Therefore sin was punished and virtue rewarded. My understanding of this is in Hamlet it is that of rationalizing of behavior before impulsive action that affirms the values of the era. We will write a custom essay sample on Reflection on Hamlet specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Reflection on Hamlet specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Reflection on Hamlet specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer This is apparent through a variety of quotes such as to be or not to be, Alexander died, Alexander was buried, Alexander returneth to dust. This shows Hamlets journey through the Christian message. Although the character of Hamlet procrastinates it is justified by his duty to God and religion. Through the quotes of or that the everlasting shows his devotion to God and fails to commit suicide. Another example is whilst Claudius is praying; although he fails to repent Hamlet is unable to murder him (whilst seeking vengeance) because Claudius appears to be repenting his sins. Hamlet is the study of the individual and how they attempt to balance internal desires and external pressures. Regardless of time/place the individual will always struggle with the balance of internal vs. external pressures. This is also apparent in Hamlet as the character Hamlet is unable to commit suicide as he has a duty to God. gainst self-slaughter. And thus he fails to suppress his internal desires too end it right now. Through humanity it is clear that there are many issues the individual face, these include suicide, duty, death and individuality/reality. These pressures provide the characters with a mean to express their viewpoints. In regards to the play, the characters of Polonius has suppressed his internal desires and replaced it with that of external pressures. He tells everybody what they want to hear as thus enables his own desires to be satisfied in an obscure manner. The quote very much like a whale, shows this and enables the audience to see the contrast in his character. The play has remained relevant over the years as the elements of human nature have remained constant. These elements include, quest for individuality, quest to understand death, quest for balance in life, pressures exerted on us both by internal and external forces. As human beings develop there is always a pursuit for satisfaction in life, the belief that there is something more to life than our selves. This is also apparent in the play Hamlet. When an audience member dwells upon the ideas that are present within the play, such as suicide, duty, illusion, death/heaven/hell, love, faith/religion it is clear that your personal understanding will make you question and re-think you ideas about them. To conclude it is clear that throughout time the themes, structure and relevance of the play has remained constant. The ever-changing values of the audience have changed, shifting the ideas that they bring forth thus creating new meanings. Although the play Hamlet can be seen in a variety of manners it is apparent that through the exploration of the characters/themes many new understandings of things in your own day to day life such as death/duty/reality enable us to perceive them in a more in-depth manner.